DOCUMENTS
Country
Report Expertise Centre
COUNTRY REPORT 2006 - 2007
1 Executive
Summary
1.1 General
conclusions
Generally speaking, there
are a number of success stories to reflect upon since 2002.
Some of these are single happenings; others are processes
which will go on. This list gives the major examples.
-
A major part of the EU legislation
as requested from Turkey at the moment, regarding its quality
infrastructure in support of the free movement of goods, has
been implemented and the authorities are actively working
to make it a part of the daily processes of the Turkish infrastructure.
-
TSE has become a standardisation
body compatible with its European counterparts and is ready
to be accepted by CEN and CENELEC, as soon as the new law
for standardisation is approved by the parliament. At the
same time TSE has managed to retain its role as an important
player in the national conformity assessment arena.
-
UME
has focused on its role as the national traceability provider
and major source of know-how in measurement and calibration.
UME is a respected partner among the international metrology
organisations EUROMET and The Metre Convention, and it represents
the Turkish interests. It also provides proficiency testing
and interlaboratory comparisons to strengthen the quality
of the Turkish laboratories.
-
Conformity assessment facilities
have substantially increased in number. Some laboratories
are organised under TURKLAB. The number of members of TÜRKLAB
is increasing and it has started to play an important role
in building up quality awareness among Turkish conformity
assessment bodies.
-
UDDer has been set up as an
association to set policy and vision on the overall quality
infrastructure. It brings together conformity assessment bodies,
accreditation body representatives, standardisation body representatives
and metrology institutions. It is expected to have an important
role in creating a dialogue between the different actors in
the future.
-
The process for assessment
and appointment of notified bodies has been established and
is expected to continue improving and providing Turkish manufacturers
with the infrastructure they need. The relevant tools are
in place and developing in line with the expectations of the
EU.
-
TÜRKAK has signed MLA with
EA and ILAC thus achieving both international and very broad
national acceptance. TÜRKAK is also an important actor in
the notification process as the body that assesses Turkish
candidate notified bodies. This provides the notifying authorities
with the tools they need for their notification process.
-
Market surveillance has been
launched and is developing continuously. Main focus at the
moment is on high risk products and the number of products
put under market surveillance has increased substantially.
However, there is still a lot to be done both in coverage
and in coordination and full access to RAPEX remains to be
achieved.
-
Consumers are becoming organised
with TükoDer as the biggest umbrella organisatiopn and they
are becoming aware of their rights and responsibilities. However,
there is still a lot to be done to increase consumer awareness.
In particular, it is important to increase the consumers’
awareness of their role as a pillar of daily market surveillance.
This summary reflects
the situation of the main actors and main components in the
Turkish national quality infrastructure.
The challenge for Turkey
now is to take this very significant progress, to finish the
remaining issues of non-compliances with respect to the Acquis
Communautaire, and to bring the quality infrastructure
into a sustainable and dynamical mode of operation.
The following table summarises
the judgement of the experts of the Turkey Country report.
| |
2002 |
2006 |
| |
|
(symbol) |
Value
/ comment |
(symbol) |
| Standardisation |
|
|
|
|
| Knowledge
on standardisation among stakeholders |
confusion |
L |
Good |
J |
| Involvement
of stakeholders |
very few |
L |
in progress |
K |
| Experts
|
very few |
L |
in progress |
K |
| Mandatory
standards |
(1250) |
L |
(261) |
J |
| Transposition
of standards |
> 80% |
J |
> 80% |
J |
| Conformity
Assessment |
|
|
|
|
| CAB
associations |
None that were known nation-wide
CAB starting |
L |
TURKLAB
with 51 members
UDDer
just established |
J
J
|
| System
certification |
Less than 70 CBs
< 4 000 certs
quality problems |
L |
110 CBs
20 000 certs
quality problems |
J
L |
| Certificates
on persons |
Limited market
< 600 certs |
L |
Rapidly growing
Around 4 600 certs |
J |
| TSE
tests |
Around 40 000 |
J |
Around 38 000 |
J |
| Notified
bodies |
None |
L |
3 NBs and further 13 potential NBs |
J |
| Market
Surveillance |
Import control
and regulated inspections |
L |
Active MS in place by responsible authorities |
J |
| Accreditation |
|
|
|
|
| National
acceptance |
Very limited |
L |
Very good |
J |
| International
acceptance |
None |
L |
Very good
Signed ILAC and EA MLA |
J |
| #
Accredited bodies |
15 |
K |
153 |
J |
| Metrology |
|
|
|
|
| Focus
on metrology (including legal) |
Weak |
K |
Stronger |
J |
| Traceability |
Varying between sectors |
K |
Well established |
J |
| Uncertainty |
Very limited |
K |
Fully implemented |
J |
| Comparisons |
Limited |
K |
Improved |
J |
| #
calibrations provided |
Limited |
L |
Increased significantly |
J |
| #
calibrations used |
Limited |
L |
Increased significantly |
J |
|